February 19, 2026 Read on charity.wtf
5.8

First I wrote the wrong book, then I wrote the right book (xpost)

ObservabilityEngineering ManagementTech CultureEngineering Practices

Charity Majors describes how she had to scrap and rewrite an entire section of the second edition of Observability Engineering after realizing she was writing tactical advice for teams operating in a strategic vacuum. Feedback from readers revealed that the real problems weren't technical implementation challenges but deeply dysfunctional organizational buying processes and a lack of shared understanding between engineering and leadership about what observability even is and why it matters.

The biggest barrier to effective observability isn't technical implementation but the lack of shared strategic alignment between engineering teams and organizational leadership about what problem they're actually trying to solve.
  • 6

    I was writing tactical advice for teams who were surviving in a strategic vacuum.

  • 5

    Organizations used to be limited by the speed of delivery; now they are limited by how swiftly they can validate and understand what they delivered.

  • 6

    Your ability to get any returns on your investments into AI will be limited by how swiftly you can validate your changes and learn from them. Another word for this is 'OBSERVABILITY'.

  • 4

    Observability is the signal that connects the dots to make a feedback loop; no observability, no loop.

  • 8

    As Tolstoy once wrote, 'Happy teams are all alike; every fucked up team is fucked up in its own precious way.'

candid, self-deprecating, passionate